Re: Discussion: Change to SC 2.6.2 Orientation

On 18/10/2017 16:14, Repsher, Stephen J wrote:
[...]
> */[Steve] That’s basically what it says now.  The issue is that if an 
> author locks it but provides or assumes a mechanism  to swap 
> orientation, then they’d fail even though there’s no inaccessibility. 
> See the GitHub issue: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/509./*

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, or this is splitting terminology, but If 
there's a mechanism to change it, then it's not locked, surely?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 15:18:28 UTC