- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:17:51 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 18/10/2017 16:14, Repsher, Stephen J wrote: [...] > */[Steve] That’s basically what it says now. The issue is that if an > author locks it but provides or assumes a mechanism to swap > orientation, then they’d fail even though there’s no inaccessibility. > See the GitHub issue: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/509./* Maybe I'm misunderstanding, or this is splitting terminology, but If there's a mechanism to change it, then it's not locked, surely? P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2017 15:18:28 UTC