OFF TOPIC - Re: [w3c/wcag21] Graphics contrast (#500)

FWIW, I agree with Micheal that promoting Benefits to sibling of Intent has
a positive benefit, and I'd support that idea going forward.

Could we strike up a straw poll around this, to take an internal
temperature of the WG? Chairs?

JF

On Oct 11, 2017 10:15 AM, "michael-n-cooper" <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

*@michael-n-cooper* commented on this pull request.

Reviewing structurally only: my major comment is that where new headings
beyond the template are introduced, the heading and content related to that
heading should be enclosed in a
element. This would be used for script processing such as generating TOC,
or style, referencing, etc.

Having a bunch of new
in the Intent section causes the Benefits section to get lost in the
shuffle. However, I've been wondering if we should promote Benefits to be a
sibling of Intent rather than a child of it (in spite of the structure that
was used for WCAG 2.0 Understanding), so this may trigger the answer into a
"yes, that matters" state.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/500#pullrequestreview-68622080>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABK-cwUY6LEdWKA2ubBDqyNohZm4Qg63ks5srM2agaJpZM4PzJme>
.