W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

OFF TOPIC - Re: [w3c/wcag21] Graphics contrast (#500)

From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:43:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKdCpxy-VazZaPZwrjs+gcbwGeboFWNusLO+QPLFQeTm1S2wWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
FWIW, I agree with Micheal that promoting Benefits to sibling of Intent has
a positive benefit, and I'd support that idea going forward.

Could we strike up a straw poll around this, to take an internal
temperature of the WG? Chairs?


On Oct 11, 2017 10:15 AM, "michael-n-cooper" <notifications@github.com>

*@michael-n-cooper* commented on this pull request.

Reviewing structurally only: my major comment is that where new headings
beyond the template are introduced, the heading and content related to that
heading should be enclosed in a
element. This would be used for script processing such as generating TOC,
or style, referencing, etc.

Having a bunch of new
in the Intent section causes the Benefits section to get lost in the
shuffle. However, I've been wondering if we should promote Benefits to be a
sibling of Intent rather than a child of it (in spite of the structure that
was used for WCAG 2.0 Understanding), so this may trigger the answer into a
"yes, that matters" state.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/500#pullrequestreview-68622080>, or mute
the thread
Received on Friday, 13 October 2017 00:44:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:17 UTC