Re: Discussion of Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

See also:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017OctDec/0043.html

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:42 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:spanchang02@yahoo.com]
> > Greetings,
> > I sincerely hope my objection to this proposed SC  will be considered.
> [Jason] As I recall, it was considered when this proposal was discussed
> earlier in the year, but the working group concluded that it was not a
> persuasive objection. Also, it's an objection to the entire success
> criterion rather than to the proposed change in the definition. The current
> CfC is confined to the issue of the definition.
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ________________________________
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion