W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: Discussion of Proposed definition for 'Programatic Notification'

From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKdCpxz0yBQxxJw_tt12RVF8xeqOV31TOYzbe_o8UGvXBRBNYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
See also:

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:42 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:spanchang02@yahoo.com]
> > Greetings,
> > I sincerely hope my objection to this proposed SC  will be considered.
> [Jason] As I recall, it was considered when this proposal was discussed
> earlier in the year, but the working group concluded that it was not a
> persuasive objection. Also, it's an objection to the entire success
> criterion rather than to the proposed change in the definition. The current
> CfC is confined to the issue of the definition.
> ________________________________
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ________________________________

John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2017 15:15:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:17 UTC