+1 to the proposal outlined by Michael. On 26/09/2017 19:53, Chris Loiselle wrote: > +1 to Michael's idea! > > Thank you, > > Chris Loiselle > 781-724-4990 > > On Sep 26, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com > <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote: > >> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday September 28th at 5:45pm Boston time. >> >> The Working Group has discussed the issue of how or whether to >> renumber WCAG 2.1 SC over the past few weeks. On the call today the >> group discussed a proposal detailed by Michael Cooper >> (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017JulSep/1097.html) >> and the group recognized that no solution was optimal, but that >> everyone could live with this solution and as a result agreed to this >> proposal. >> >> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-ag-minutes.html#item02 >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have >> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you >> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know >> before the CfC deadline. >> >> Thanks, >> AWK >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> Adobe >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com> >> http://twitter.com/awkawk -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk carpe diemReceived on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 14:11:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:16 UTC