Re: CFC: Numbering WCAG 2.1

+1 to the proposal outlined by Michael.


On 26/09/2017 19:53, Chris Loiselle wrote:
> +1 to Michael's idea!
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Chris Loiselle
> 781-724-4990
> 
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com 
> <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday September 28th at 5:45pm Boston time.
>>
>> The Working Group has discussed the issue of how or whether to 
>> renumber WCAG 2.1 SC over the past few weeks. On the call today the 
>> group discussed a proposal detailed by Michael Cooper 
>> (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017JulSep/1097.html) 
>> and the group recognized that no solution was optimal, but that 
>> everyone could live with this solution and as a result agreed to this 
>> proposal.
>>
>> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-ag-minutes.html#item02
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
>> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
>> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
>> before the CfC deadline.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>> Adobe
>>
>> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk carpe diem

Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2017 14:11:51 UTC