RE: Proposed approach on WCAG 2.1 numbering and IDs

I can live with this as a solution, but, as noted at the meeting, this stance (combined with reluctance by some to countenance any modification of any existing success criteria) strengthens the case for proceeding to work on Silver after the 2.1 Recommendation is issued.

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:48 PM
To: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed approach on WCAG 2.1 numbering and IDs

+1


Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdavidmacdonald100&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=7txhRAepFw5d1Tvw8xj9TKoy9JxKB0AnjO4%2BhVKYv%2B4%3D&reserved=0>

twitter.com/davidmacd<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fdavidmacd&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=0qK122AIQxpQuzOrixeM99l8UUOEGdVLl%2BNP%2FMfrgCY%3D&reserved=0>

GitHub<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FDavidMacDonald&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=ZIryMBAOff%2F9v3ww9kYJa6td4IOH4x3xxoLDVZhogg4%3D&reserved=0>

www.Can-Adapt.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.can-adapt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=r65SZukR8HS85TzA7bWKzWtF62GNJM7x4ldCWcGzP6A%3D&reserved=0>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidmacd.com%2Fdisclaimer.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=pemgKlo%2Fo6%2BpNAEY5mT%2F%2BA0T8J3Dt3LPscJkJYRklfc%3D&reserved=0>

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk<mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote:
On 26/09/2017 15:39, Michael Cooper wrote:
[...]
Essentially this all boils down to, let's not make any changes from how the draft is currently structured to accommodate numbering and IDs. With this stabilized, we can now look at other issues on the SC without worrying about the impact on numbering.

+1


--
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splintered.co.uk&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=x78NNZFk5%2Fkf%2B6CKyBiM5hBalfBA5QcWYPREmbhVyPY%3D&reserved=0> | https://github.com/patrickhlauke<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpatrickhlauke&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=Do29beQg2FTngVUqwsoXbm%2Bm3jbU3q4VxSaFz8sOhkA%3D&reserved=0>
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fredux%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=%2FppeDZKaZXkTNh2r9tKmQqlWsMBnYGoiAkR424RdbTA%3D&reserved=0> | http://redux.deviantart.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fredux.deviantart.com&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C8c47820136d24d8b93e308d505202617%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636420557987911638&sdata=0iaLqPeH6Y9GoWxbW4M1j%2BJYGCS7mc42aRScKE2ay3U%3D&reserved=0>
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 20:54:49 UTC