Re: CFC - Device Sensors

Should we add "undo" to the decision page?
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> AGWG’ers,
>
> As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no
> responses indicating that group members could not live this this decision,
> this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.
>
> This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
> From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:10
> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: CFC - Device Sensors
> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 12:11
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday September 5th at 12:00pm Boston time.
>
> We received an appeal on a previous decision which we have discussed with
> proponents and objectors and came up with a plan that minimally revises the
> SC through the addition of an ednote to the SC and are now running a new
> CFC to seek the approval of the group.
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success Criteria 'Device
> Sensors' for inclusion in the editor’s draft, with the goal of obtaining
> additional input external to the working group.
>
> Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/08/22-ag-minutes.html
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/device-sensors_ISSUE-67/
> guidelines/sc/21/device-sensors.html
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>