Re: CFC - Device Sensors

+1 with the same caveats as Jason.

On 8/31/2017 9:58 AM, White, Jason J wrote:
>
> I prefer Steve’s note. I can live without it, as the entire proposal 
> is about to be revisited anyway.
>
> Thus, I give a +1 to the CfC, on the understanding that it’s merely a 
> procedural device to allow reconsideration of this proposal after 
> August. I would not support the current text later in the WCAG 2.1 
> process, due to the difficulties pointed out repeatedly in the working 
> group’s discussion of the proposal.
>
> *From:*Repsher, Stephen J [mailto:stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:48 PM
> *To:* Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* RE: CFC - Device Sensors
>
> The editor’s note change I proposed to more accurately cover the 
> issues is not reflected here.  It was:
>
> Editors´ Note: The Working Group is aware of issues surrounding both 
> the wide scope of device sensors for this SC and confusion over 
> redundancy with SC 2.1.1. These are expected to be addressed soon, and 
> draft new wording for review focused on motion actuation is available 
> at https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/67#issuecomment-325716721 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fgithub.com-252Fw3c-252Fwcag21-252Fissues-252F67-2523issuecomment-2D325716721-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cjjwhite-2540ets.org-257C31d07a629a7e43ad617a08d4efc77d6a-257C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65-257C0-257C0-257C636397087462228588-26sdata-3DWiwpYcVpKkXrisRW82z6G-252BHghsecFJzEcSshK0K5kLA-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=dOfmV-XoaoX7kczUm5NyQKu8JSZtFquLTBom7I4w5rs&s=ybGqHQwZ0ZPTJB8FQxhZQui83ame8iUNQcQ8YjlE1Ig&e=>
>
> Steve
>
> *From:*Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:11 PM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
> *Subject:* CFC - Device Sensors
> *Importance:* High
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday September 5th at 12:00pm Boston time.
>
> We received an appeal on a previous decision which we have discussed 
> with proponents and objectors and came up with a plan that minimally 
> revises the SC through the addition of an ednote to the SC and are now 
> running a new CFC to seek the approval of the group.
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success Criteria 
> 'Device Sensors' for inclusion in the editor’s draft, with the goal of 
> obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
> Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/08/22-ag-minutes.html 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Fwww.w3.org-252F2017-252F08-252F22-2Dag-2Dminutes.html-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cjjwhite-2540ets.org-257Cd19612dec18143d83a7f08d4f0903f20-257C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65-257C0-257C0-257C636397949760644730-26sdata-3Dmf3BWYYh6-252F5265W3Iy0AGuh6fEOyqlaamxBDYL2UeTo-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=dOfmV-XoaoX7kczUm5NyQKu8JSZtFquLTBom7I4w5rs&s=CuqrxLN5Ve5eJoEoBz-yUfYeje0YqbtjlFPxEfhoXjY&e=>
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/device-sensors_ISSUE-67/guidelines/sc/21/device-sensors.html 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Frawgit.com-252Fw3c-252Fwcag21-252Fdevice-2Dsensors-5FISSUE-2D67-252Fguidelines-252Fsc-252F21-252Fdevice-2Dsensors.html-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cjjwhite-2540ets.org-257Cd19612dec18143d83a7f08d4f0903f20-257C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65-257C0-257C0-257C636397949760644730-26sdata-3DNpleUM9aShFWmg1zb7ptWtMFaU-252Fowy4110oTe3M1TVM-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=dOfmV-XoaoX7kczUm5NyQKu8JSZtFquLTBom7I4w5rs&s=ynZk42yUyPmZwg2wKofK790jWMOTG1wy9qjq40yUd-o&e=> 
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Ftwitter.com-252Fawkawk-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cjjwhite-2540ets.org-257Cd19612dec18143d83a7f08d4f0903f20-257C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65-257C0-257C0-257C636397949760644730-26sdata-3DRgckteaT3dhlaxyFvc-252FKySRB30gBbINVTYIazCjkkhI-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=ELX2morANsauwtoroVrFb2wD7s1u7PsR47DTXqRvJ34&m=dOfmV-XoaoX7kczUm5NyQKu8JSZtFquLTBom7I4w5rs&s=Hd4Rvyy6OGQq8xgxDVzWdgJ_8xSToHKgxFCW5XTNsq8&e=>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged 
> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual 
> for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you 
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not 
> disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the 
> contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any 
> other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Regards, James

Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
James Nurthen | Principal Engineer, Accessibility
Phone: +1 650 506 6781 <tel:+1%20650%20506%206781> | Mobile: +1 415 987 
1918 <tel:+1%20415%20987%201918> | Video: james.nurthen@oracle.com 
<sip:james.nurthen@oracle.com>
Oracle Corporate Architecture
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood Cty, CA 94065
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to 
developing practices and products that help protect the environment

Received on Thursday, 31 August 2017 18:43:22 UTC