Re: CFC - Device Sensors

Thanks Patrick, yes, I'd be happy to see that. Do others agree to this approach? 
Thanks 
Josh
InterAccess - Accessible UX
-------- Original message --------From: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk> Date: 26/08/2017  12:27  (GMT+00:00) To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: CFC - Device Sensors 
On 26/08/2017 10:44, Joshue O Connor wrote:
[...]
> So, I'm concerned that if we do not now get wider review we risk 
> throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm actually not comfortable 
> taking the opportunity for wider review when what seems like an 
> interesting/progressive SC is on the table.

Any chance of adding a prominent editorial note in the draft pointing 
out that the exact wording is under review due to potential scope issues?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke