Re: CFC - Timeouts SC

AGWG’ers,

As we have received a majority of positive responses leading up to this 
CfC, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.

This decision will be recorded at 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>

Thanks

Josh

ALAN SMITH wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Alan Smith
>
> *From: *Andrew Kirkpatrick <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 17, 2017 6:35 PM
> *To: *WCAG <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *CFC - Timeouts SC
> *Importance: *High
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday August 21st at 7:00pm Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success Criteria for 
> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: Timeouts, at AA, with the goal of 
> obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/08/15-ag-minutes.html
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/timeouts_ISSUE-14/guidelines/#timeouts
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie

Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2017 12:39:49 UTC