W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2017

Re: Where we stand on Animations SC #18

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:57:14 +0100
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <785be0d7-50c0-ebc6-f37c-3a5d2a349381@splintered.co.uk>
On 16/08/2017 16:29, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>> That’s a good point, I shouldn’t have used that as an example. We want to ignore the size/timing aspects we had in the term ‘significant’ when at AAA.
> */[Steve] So scrolling marquees  should be in or out of scope?/*
> In, mostly for simplicity rather than thinking a text-marque would be a 
> trigger. Differentiating a small text-marque from a larger carousel is 
> getting back into ‘significant’ territory and too much complexity.

Also noting that the SC is "Animation from interactions" so not 
applicable to marquees unless they're scrolling/animating as result of 
an interaction?


Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 15:57:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:16 UTC