Re: CFC - Concurrent Input Mechanisms SC

Glenda just pointed out that the link text is correct but apparently my Outlook client decided to retain the link to a different location while displaying the correct URL. Pasting it below here for good measure.

https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/concurrent-input-mechanisms_ISSUE-64/guidelines/#concurrent-input-mechanisms


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>>
Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 13:45
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: CFC - Concurrent Input Mechanisms SC

I’m having difficulty finding the proposed text in the draft cited by the CfC. Is this a local issue or are others seeing it as well?

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 11:38 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: CFC - Concurrent Input Mechanisms SC
Importance: High

Call For Consensus — ends Thursday August 10th at 12:00pm Boston time.

The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success Criteria for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: Concurrent Input Mechanisms, at AA, with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.

Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/08/08-ag-minutes.html<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F08%2F08-ag-minutes.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C8713f9e74b8c4de6607708d4df4e5dd4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636378975074200148&sdata=wUKl638hUxLrSMdjJje48ASNeSAclgHZVNx6i1MvZdw%3D&reserved=0>

The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/concurrent-input-mechanisms_ISSUE-64/guidelines/#concurrent-input-mechanisms<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Ftarget-size_ISSUE-60%2Fguidelines%2F%23target-size&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C178daf6b84ba4af5887d08d4de738f7f%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636378035291186286&sdata=%2FjkiAHH5zDRS5jkej6Ckn4bDRAkJ82OTSlfWIZWJnNs%3D&reserved=0>

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C178daf6b84ba4af5887d08d4de738f7f%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636378035291186286&sdata=zIYs2BJyqBaVhGXhrKR43R8y7WYMnCIBjEL5srX7l0I%3D&reserved=0>


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2017 18:32:02 UTC