- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:28:18 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 02/08/2017 13:41, David MacDonald wrote: > I support the use of numbered lists because it allows the bullets to be > referenced to like this 3.3.4.2, or 3.3.4 #2 So...are you advocating changing all other non-numbered/bulleted lists to numbered ones? Or just leaving the weird inconsistency as is? P > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > / Adapting the web to *all* users/ > > / Including those with disabilities/ > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk > <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk>> wrote: > > On 02/08/2017 10:15, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > > [...] > > SCs with ordered/numbered lists: 1.4.8, 3.3.4, 3.3.6 > > I'd suggest changing the ordered lists to unordered would make > most sense. And as I don't believe this change alters the > meaning of the SCs' normative text, this is purely > editorial/non-substantive. > > > Addendum: I can see the potential argument that in the case of 1.4.8 > numbered list was used to emphasise that all of those conditions > need to be true. However, that's not the case for 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 > (they're "at least one..." type lists there). > > And if 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 were changed to unordered lists (to match all > other instances of "at least one..." type lists), then 1.4.8 would > be the only numbered list, so I'd argue it should also be changed to > unordered, perhaps strengthening the prose before the list instead > to emphasise that ALL conditions must be met. > > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk <http://www.splintered.co.uk> | > https://github.com/patrickhlauke <https://github.com/patrickhlauke> > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ <http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> | > http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 17:28:42 UTC