- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:34:56 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 02/08/2017 10:15, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: [...] > SCs with ordered/numbered lists: 1.4.8, 3.3.4, 3.3.6 > > I'd suggest changing the ordered lists to unordered would make most > sense. And as I don't believe this change alters the meaning of the SCs' > normative text, this is purely editorial/non-substantive. Addendum: I can see the potential argument that in the case of 1.4.8 numbered list was used to emphasise that all of those conditions need to be true. However, that's not the case for 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 (they're "at least one..." type lists there). And if 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 were changed to unordered lists (to match all other instances of "at least one..." type lists), then 1.4.8 would be the only numbered list, so I'd argue it should also be changed to unordered, perhaps strengthening the prose before the list instead to emphasise that ALL conditions must be met. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2017 11:35:20 UTC