Re: CFC Conformance changes

AGWG’ers,

As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no responses indicating that group members could not live this this decision, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.

This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 14:54
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: CFC Conformance changes
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 14:54

Call For Consensus — ends Thursday July 20 at 3:00pm Boston time.

The Working Group has reviewed and approved changes in the conformance criteria section for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.

Survey results:  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/62-63-71-conformance/results<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2F62-63-71-conformance%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb0017ac138b49aca3ec08d4ce0e88f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009203663395&sdata=znyZmjbtY%2For9I43W22j%2FmL%2BAib5yxy6%2BpHvcop7rIw%3D&reserved=0>
Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/07/18-ag-minutes.html#item03<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F07%2F18-ag-minutes.html%23item03&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb0017ac138b49aca3ec08d4ce0e88f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009203663395&sdata=eTx6PGFqHmrtKjMGjtLyuOjFuWjoKNXLLYB77NKkbjI%3D&reserved=0>

The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/62-63-71-conformance-changes/guidelines/#conformance-reqs<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2F62-63-71-conformance-changes%2Fguidelines%2F%23conformance-reqs&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb0017ac138b49aca3ec08d4ce0e88f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009203663395&sdata=c2okrsa5DCQ%2BtauFnaiKnm8NyDItfvo6ZooSA8IoDUU%3D&reserved=0>  (the change is that a 3rd note was added to the full pages conformance criteria.)

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb0017ac138b49aca3ec08d4ce0e88f5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636360009203663395&sdata=7qj2h6%2FG1gYUIuEdj2nodJAXInfOK5SNFxykP92qFDQ%3D&reserved=0>