RE: Issue 21 thoughts

I think this is interesting. Currently, we don’t explicitly address natural language dialog systems or spoken interfaces more generally, at all. It would be a worthwhile exercise to look at WCAG as a whole to find out how well it applies to a speech interface, and wehther any assumptions about the primary user interface being graphical have found their way into the success criteria.

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:28 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Issue 21 thoughts

AGWG,
I’ve talked with Lisa about issue 21 (Task completion) and have a suggestion for a pretty substantial change to it. Please take a look below and see what you think.

https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/21#issuecomment-317046828<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F21%23issuecomment-317046828&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7C159a2bc1fc1e4402b6eb08d4d0559be8%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636362513487671678&sdata=ZbNeUe8MV4mVBPGm5h7MSB7pML5ha%2FyKB9186StvPn8%3D&reserved=0>

Thanks,
AWK


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________