David wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but requiring every <div> and <span> on the web to provide semantics, or require that they be contained within an element which has this semantic context is anything but "nudging developers gently". If I understand the proposal correctly, It think it will require an incredible effort by developers, a huge ask. That’s what I thought as well. Plus the comments about how do you know if you’ve passed, who chooses the taxonomy etc. Also, this is rather misleading: > those semantics alone don't do much without the other parts of Lisa's proposal (the JSON and scripted bits). With the proposed narrow scope, it would be pretty easy to knock up a script (or extension) to show icons next to, instead of, or over (on-hover) for the few dozen items it applies to. It is on the same level as the text-adaption (if it doesn’t impact layout), which is one of the reasons I’m in favour. Whichever way you look at it there is some user-side tech needed, but I’m flummoxed as to why there is argument to make it more complex. Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 22:46:37 UTC