RE: Subgroups proposal for support personalization and important request from coga

Hi Wayne,

I think the problem is that (for the context / conventional elements at least) they don’t have native semantics (so not 1.3.1), and elements like links already have a role and a name, value doesn’t match, so they are not covered by role/name/value either.



From: Wayne]

> What we are proposes really appears to be cases of 1.3.1 that were not covered in previous iterations of the techniques.

Received on Tuesday, 18 July 2017 20:16:10 UTC