Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle

Hi Alastair,

I'm just wondering whether the gestalt nature of the pie chart (and similar effects of arrangements) might mitigate the need for 4.5:1 for *all* elements. If you had a pie with four wedges and the fourth was low contrast, all four having a labelled legend explaining what colour is what, the fourth wedge with insufficent contrast would be quite easy to identify by force of exclusion (it's the one remaining if you take away the three others which DO meet 4,5:1 against background AND the other two in the set). This is of course not scalable but I wonder if gestalt / shape might have to be taken into account somehow. For me, it seems to make a difference whether you have some arbitrary shape against a background or an ensemble with an overall gestalt (pies, bars etc.) where both gestalt and order of elements may help in associating the correct label. If you think this makes it just more confusing or see it as a thin end of a wedge, by all means disregard this comment.

Best,
Detlev

--
Detlev Fischer
testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg

Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Alastair Campbell schrieb am 07.12.2016 13:25:

> HI James,
> 
> As a quick follow up, I’ve added a section to that page that works through
> making a pie-chart accessible, and which of the guidelines each example would
> pass/fail:
> https://alastairc.ac/tests/graphics-contrast-explanation.html#piechart 
> 
> This time I started with a default Excel pie chart, and made adjustments so
> that each one demos a different approach.
> 
> Hopefully that is much clearer.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -Alastair
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 12:54:51 UTC