W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback

From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:14:49 +0000
To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <emacc65e07-1ae6-4352-974c-4390c8ab0322@josh_machine>
Thanks for stepping up Laura and talking a few SCs :-)

E'one else - please do point your browser at 



------ Original Message ------
From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>
To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 07/12/2016 13:17:40
Subject: Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback

>Hi Alastair and all,
>Yes - I really like this direction, and Alastair thanks for taking a 
>lead on this, and to David for previous work. You guys have mentioned 
>an Excel spreadsheet and I'm not
>averse to that but, I just don't recall seeing it. We do need to work 
>off something that e'one can see. I'm concerned also about the 
>accessibility of the tool/platform that we use and agree that Table 
>wiki markup may not the best option as things can break easily.  The 
>chairs will need to discuss this general 'SC Managers' approach in more 
>detail but at the very least - to get the ball rolling it would not 
>hurt to quickly get a sense of those in the group who are willing and 
>able to ramp up this SC review work.
>So with this in mind I've set up a draft 'SC Managers' page in our 
>wiki, not with a table but just a simple page where people can add 
>their names, and list SCs they wish to manage. There is also a brief 
>guide. [1]
>To get this going, I have added a couple of names of working group 
>members who have 'signed up' to manage SCs (Alastair, Glenda, Wayne, 
>along with the candidate SCs they have choosen. Please feel free to add 
>yourself and any SC you wish to work on. The list is available here [2]
>Alastair, I've incorporated some of your suggestions into the 'guide' - 
>very helpful.
>IMO the managers role - as I see it, is someone who can co-ordinate the 
>feedback and help iterate the SC, incorporate feedback, make edits etc.
>It does not have to be the originator of the SC, and that may even be 
>preferable as it could inject objectivity into proceedings, as well as 
>a fresh perspective.
>The SC manager would also look for similarities/synergies etc with 
>other candidate SCs and have other duties suggested in the guide.
>In terms of scheduling reviews - I like the idea of Phases/Milestones - 
>we are currently in an provisional review/acceptance phase.
>If 20 people from the group take  even 3 SCs each then we can make 
>progress steadily. This should be a manageable number for anyone.
>Thanks for input all - this is a draft very useful and hope it is 
>workable for e'one.
>Comments/suggestions welcome
>[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1
>[2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues
>Joshue O Connor | Director
>InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:07 UTC