- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:14:49 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <emacc65e07-1ae6-4352-974c-4390c8ab0322@josh_machine>
Thanks for stepping up Laura and talking a few SCs :-) E'one else - please do point your browser at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1 Appreciated. Josh ------ Original Message ------ From: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: 07/12/2016 13:17:40 Subject: Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback >Hi Alastair and all, > >Yes - I really like this direction, and Alastair thanks for taking a >lead on this, and to David for previous work. You guys have mentioned >an Excel spreadsheet and I'm not >averse to that but, I just don't recall seeing it. We do need to work >off something that e'one can see. I'm concerned also about the >accessibility of the tool/platform that we use and agree that Table >wiki markup may not the best option as things can break easily. The >chairs will need to discuss this general 'SC Managers' approach in more >detail but at the very least - to get the ball rolling it would not >hurt to quickly get a sense of those in the group who are willing and >able to ramp up this SC review work. > >So with this in mind I've set up a draft 'SC Managers' page in our >wiki, not with a table but just a simple page where people can add >their names, and list SCs they wish to manage. There is also a brief >guide. [1] >To get this going, I have added a couple of names of working group >members who have 'signed up' to manage SCs (Alastair, Glenda, Wayne, >David), >along with the candidate SCs they have choosen. Please feel free to add >yourself and any SC you wish to work on. The list is available here [2] >Alastair, I've incorporated some of your suggestions into the 'guide' - >very helpful. > >IMO the managers role - as I see it, is someone who can co-ordinate the >feedback and help iterate the SC, incorporate feedback, make edits etc. >It does not have to be the originator of the SC, and that may even be >preferable as it could inject objectivity into proceedings, as well as >a fresh perspective. >The SC manager would also look for similarities/synergies etc with >other candidate SCs and have other duties suggested in the guide. > >In terms of scheduling reviews - I like the idea of Phases/Milestones - >we are currently in an provisional review/acceptance phase. >If 20 people from the group take even 3 SCs each then we can make >progress steadily. This should be a manageable number for anyone. > >Thanks for input all - this is a draft very useful and hope it is >workable for e'one. > >Comments/suggestions welcome > >[1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/SC_Managers_Phase1 >[2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues > > >Joshue O Connor | Director >InterAccess.ie - Accessible UX >
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 15:12:02 UTC