Re: Feedback on new SCs?

I’d vote against that practice for now…

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>>
Date: Monday, December 5, 2016 at 06:19
To: josh <josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>
Cc: "tink@tink.uk<mailto:tink@tink.uk>" <tink@tink.uk<mailto:tink@tink.uk>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Feedback on new SCs?
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Monday, December 5, 2016 at 06:20

Should we also start adding "+1" to success criteria we want to see in wcag 2.1?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>




---- On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 16:19:38 +0200 josh<josh@interaccess.ie<mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>> wrote ----
Hi Leonie,

Yes,  Git hub.

Thanks

Josh



InterAccess - Accessible UX

-------- Original message --------
From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk<mailto:tink@tink.uk>>
Date: 04/12/2016 13:13 (GMT+00:00)
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Feedback on new SCs?

Hello everyone,

Could someone let me know what the best way of providing feedback and/or
asking questions about individual proposed SCs is? Github?

Léonie.

--
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem