- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 04:42:52 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGNQJ8zZWhoT3Zph1vX_7ZaGP0iAqp3OPqzTfdU3OPYkJA@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to not using the same handles. These are great identifiers for the SCs, better usually than the numbers. They are much more useful if we can give each SC a clear and unique handle. Wilco On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > The way this has been handled previously in WCAG 2 is to have the AA and > AAA have same title, but to also add "(No exception)" to the tighter AAA > one. > > P > > On 02/12/2016 10:56, lisa.seeman wrote: > >> Happy to change handles , however it might help to have it the same >> because they address exactly the same thing, and it is just the scope >> that is different - so looking at the three together kind of makes sense. >> >> All the best >> >> Lisa Seeman >> >> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter >> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >> >> >> >> >> ---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 11:49:36 +0200 *David >> MacDonald<david100@sympatico.ca>* wrote ---- >> >> Got it.. >> >> Perhaps we should have different handles for different SCs... >> >> I found it confusing, especially since the text of the SC is almost >> the same. >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> http://www.can-adapt.com/ >> >> >> >> / Adapting the web to *all* users/ >> >> / Including those with disabilities/ >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy >> policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:53 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com >> <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote: >> >> __ >> Hi David >> >> Issue 31 and 41 are similar but not duplicates. They have very >> different scopes which enable a different conformance level and >> balance user need with author burden. >> >> >> All the best >> >> Lisa Seeman >> >> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter >> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> >> >> >> >> >> ---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:21:50 +0200 David >> MacDonald<david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> >> wrote ---- >> >> Issue 73 and 79 seem to be duplicates LVTF >> Issue 8 and 80 seem to be duplicates LVTF >> Issues 30 and 41 >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> http://www.can-adapt.com/ >> >> >> >> / Adapting the web to *all* users/ >> >> / Including those with disabilities/ >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review >> our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2016 03:43:27 UTC