- From: Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:54:49 -0800
- To: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: W3c-Wai-Gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOh2y+-3TeXOd=L2eR4Ben+hDr1ao7AadXj+Mm_0sv+-yOOBXw@mail.gmail.com>
+ 1 For FACs Thaddeus On Dec 2, 2016 3:08 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks > > We have tried to address the issues that are likely to be raised in the > benefits sections > > Please read the whole thing if you can before asking questions. > > I also want to write an FAQ's to answer common questions as there arise. > Will that be useful? > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:10:42 +0200 *<josh@interaccess.ie > <josh@interaccess.ie>>* wrote ---- > > To be serious, yes - we do appreciated that there is a lot to do and it is > a big ask for the group. We will be staggering the items that are for > review so we hope this will make things a little easier. Actually, we are > really looking for 'provisional approval' of these new SCs at this point, > so these SCs are the first tranche 'candidates' and this phase is a > really a first pass. > > In this pass we aim to whittle these down, reduce duplication, identify > where SCs from TFs are related and can be merged etc. > Then identify sets that will be chosen for any final cut. So this is a > rough overview of what we will be doing. So, lets all take a deep breath, > roll up our sleeves etc. > > Thanks > > Josh > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 12:55:34 UTC