Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3

+ Other: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_Proposed_New_
Success_Criteria_not_in_any_task_force

JF



On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:52 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> There could be quite a few additions to WCAG 2.1 depending on what from
> the Task Force Wish lists makes it in.
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/mobile-a11y-tf/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Succe
> ss_Criteria_Submission_Requirements  (Mobile)
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/index.html (COGA)
> http://w3c.github.io/low-vision-a11y-tf/requirements.html (Low Vision)
> https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-accessibility/      (DPUB)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 November 2016 at 15:10, Kurt Mattes <kurt.mattes@deque.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In addition to good vetting efforts, I would expect a dot release draft
>>> to generate fewer comments than the 2.0 draft due to it containing fewer
>>> changes.
>>
>>
>> agreed
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> SteveF
>> Current Standards Work @W3C
>> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>
>>
>
>


-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion