- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:19:09 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDY+61Vf87WWRA+ct1oaVKRnPKhToTqTY37oDsAj3fxmVg@mail.gmail.com>
Right... the SC would give a contrast minimum for focus, not a prescription of HOW that is to be done. We've *never* required specific techniques in WCAG. It just happens that when Jon mentioned VO cursor, it solved the problem I saw the LVTF having with this requirement of changing button colours and having to have different classes of focus rings so they all had proper contrast. The double ring (white/black) is a great idea by Apple. But there are many other ways to ensure good contrast between interactive elements and their focus rings. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > > As a Technique, this may very well address the problem statement, > however we must be careful not to be overly prescriptive of our > expectations - we cannot for example 'mandate' this as a Success Criteria > going forward. > > > > I agree, often we use changes in background colours which are far more > obvious. > > > > It might be a good SC for a future set of guidelines that include > user-agents though ;-) > > > > -Alastair > > > > >
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 17:19:44 UTC