Re: CfC: Issue 200

Sorry I didnt see this earlier.   I don’t want to block consensus..  But I had a lot to do with this provision and I believe that the numbers should be taken at the accuracy that they are presented at.

That is     4.5:1  has only one digit of accuracy.     So  4.499  is in fact  4.5 at the degree of accuracy in the WCAG.  

But consensus is not   ‘what do I think it should be’   but   ‘can I live with it’  

And I can live with it.    

gregg

> On Oct 25, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> CALL FOR CONSENSUS – ends Thursday October 27 at 5:00pm Boston time.
> 
> This is a proposed response to an issue that was submitted.  The item was surveyed, discussed on the WG call, and approved (http://www.w3.org/2016/10/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item04).
> 
> The original issue and proposed response: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/200#issuecomment-256091343 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/200#issuecomment-256091343>. 
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this position, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
> 
> Thanks,
> AWK
> 
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe 
> 
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk <http://twitter.com/awkawk>
>