W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 07:39:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEy-OxG1n0P+ngNgU0Bm9resjhTKOUWxZPU+C=dwYGX8VPWJzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, wai-wcag-editor@w3.org
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Josh and WCAG Editors,

Thanks, my comments are:

1. I like some of the new ideas in this version.

2. All places where it says "low vision or cognitive disabilities", please
replace 'or' with 'and'. So it should read: low vision and cognitive

3. Where can we see the schedule for the updates is documented in the AG WG
Project Management Plan?


Katie Haritos-Shea

On Oct 10, 2016 6:00 AM, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:

> Hi Katie and all,
> Katie said:
> >I would ask again, especially of the chairs, if a regular cycle >must be
> defined, why compromise, apparently, is no longer >an option in this WG any
> more. Why is there no ability to >compromise between 10 and 2? on say 3, 4
> or 5 years?
> Of course there is. All of this work is about the line between our end
> users requirements and the needs and wants of the group members etc. So we
> are working towards a compromise/workable solution. I urge everyone to take
> a breath. There is a new draft that the group will get a chance to give two
> or three cents on but we have been listening, and take very seriously yours
> (and others) ardent concerns. [1]
> Notice that details of timeframe etc are being moved out of the charter to
> a seperate 'AG WG Project Management Plan' doc that is being worked on.
> More details to follow.
> I appreciated e'ones input on this but think it is time to find some zen
> space to let this evolve in a sensible way.
> Thanks
> Josh
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter
Received on Monday, 10 October 2016 11:40:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:06 UTC