Re: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle

Josh and WCAG Editors,

Thanks, my comments are:

1. I like some of the new ideas in this version.

2. All places where it says "low vision or cognitive disabilities", please
replace 'or' with 'and'. So it should read: low vision and cognitive
disabilities

3. Where can we see the schedule for the updates is documented in the AG WG
Project Management Plan?

Thanks!

Katie Haritos-Shea
703-371-5545

On Oct 10, 2016 6:00 AM, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote:

> Hi Katie and all,
>
> Katie said:
>
> >I would ask again, especially of the chairs, if a regular cycle >must be
> defined, why compromise, apparently, is no longer >an option in this WG any
> more. Why is there no ability to >compromise between 10 and 2? on say 3, 4
> or 5 years?
>
> Of course there is. All of this work is about the line between our end
> users requirements and the needs and wants of the group members etc. So we
> are working towards a compromise/workable solution. I urge everyone to take
> a breath. There is a new draft that the group will get a chance to give two
> or three cents on but we have been listening, and take very seriously yours
> (and others) ardent concerns. [1]
>
> Notice that details of timeframe etc are being moved out of the charter to
> a seperate 'AG WG Project Management Plan' doc that is being worked on.
>
> More details to follow.
>
> I appreciated e'ones input on this but think it is time to find some zen
> space to let this evolve in a sensible way.
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/09/draft-wcag-charter
>
>