From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 12:35 PM Jason, I have to say that I am against NOT providing a regular updated cycle for organizations and government to begin to plan for – and this can include Sliver. I think we need that. [Jason] Is it really possible to establish such expectations at present? In the first place, there is disagreement about what the update plans should be. Second, we haven’t had the experience of developing WCAG 2.1 as an extension to 2.0 while striving to meet a fairly ambitious schedule. Third, any subsequent versions would require Charter approval from the W3C membership. I think that subsequent plans would be better decided after 2.1 is completed. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 17:04:32 UTC