Friday, 30 December 2016
Wednesday, 28 December 2016
Friday, 23 December 2016
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: requirement 8
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
Thursday, 22 December 2016
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- requirement 8
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- RE: Discussion on SC numbering
- RE: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 21 December 2016
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- RE: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
Tuesday, 20 December 2016
- WCAG Minutes 20 December 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
Monday, 19 December 2016
- Lots of GitHub email
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- RE: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: Discussion on SC numbering
- WCAG 2.1 Requirements for SC
- Discussion on SC numbering
- Re: WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- WCAG meeting December 20, 2016
- do we have a call tomorow?
- Spacing SC Github Issue #78
- Re: Update to SC Manager page, with video tutorials
- Re: Update to SC Manager page, with video tutorials
- Re: Update to SC Manager page, with video tutorials
- Re: Update to SC Manager page, with video tutorials
Friday, 16 December 2016
Thursday, 15 December 2016
- Call for agenda items for next week
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re[2]: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
- testability section in the success cryteria
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- Re: What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 14 December 2016
- Re: What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
- RE: What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
- Re: What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
- Re: SC Managers and success criteria review
- SC Managers and success criteria review
- RE: WCAG Agenda December 13 , 2016
- Re: Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey
- RE: Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey
Monday, 12 December 2016
- RE: Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey
- Minutes of Silver TF F2F Day 1 - 12 December 2016
- Survey Format suggestions, Adding Acceptance Criteria for SCs in Survey
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: WCAG Agenda December 13 , 2016
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: WCAG Agenda December 13 , 2016
Sunday, 11 December 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda December 13 , 2016
- Re: What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
Saturday, 10 December 2016
- WCAG Agenda December 13 , 2016
- What is the role of the Task Forces now that the SCs have been submitted?
Friday, 9 December 2016
- Reminder of Silver Stakeholder submission deadline
- Minutes of the Silver Task Force teleconference of 9 December 2016
Thursday, 8 December 2016
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Question: description of scope attribute in HTML5
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- RE: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
Wednesday, 7 December 2016
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 7 December 2016
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re[5]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Global map of WCAG participants
- RE: Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re[3]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re[2]: Co-ordinating SC feedback
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: FAQ's for coga
- Re: Meta Data
- Re: Co-ordinating feedback
- RE: Co-ordinating feedback
- Co-ordinating feedback
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
Tuesday, 6 December 2016
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Re: Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Agenda for Silver Task Force teleconference of Friday 9 December 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Minutes of the Silver Task Force Teleconference of 6 December 2016
- RE: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- FAQ's for coga
- RE: Meta Data
- RE: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Re: DPUB proposal for metadata SC
- CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Re: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
Monday, 5 December 2016
- Re: CSUN F2F
- RE: Meta Data
- Re: Meta Data
- Re: agenda for Silver Task Force for 6 December 2016
- DPUB proposal for metadata SC
- CSUN F2F
- Issue #3 Programmatic Notification
- agenda for Silver Task Force for 6 December 2016
- Graphics contrast - critical principle
- Re: Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
- RE: WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- WCAG meeting December 6, 2016
- Re: Feedback on new SCs?
- Re: Feedback on new SCs?
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Saturday, 3 December 2016
- Re: duplicate SCs filed
- Re: read the whole thing ?
- Re: Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- Re: Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
Friday, 2 December 2016
- Re: duplicate SCs filed
- Re: read the whole thing ?
- Minutes of the Silver TF teleconference of 2 December 2016
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- RE: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: Perspectives on accessibility from UK Gov
- Re[2]: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- RE: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- Perspectives on accessibility from UK Gov
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re[4]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- RE: Comment on change in scope for charter
- Re: read the whole thing ?
- Re: read the whole thing ?
- Re: read the whole thing ?
- Re: Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- read the whole thing ?
- Re: duplicate SCs filed
- Re: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- Re[2]: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- Re: duplicate SCs filed
- Re: duplicate SCs filed
- Re: Comment on change in scope for charter
- duplicate SCs filed
- Re: 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- Re: Comment on change in scope for charter
- Re: Meta Data
- Re: Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
- RE: Comment on change in scope for charter
- RE: Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
- RE: Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
- Re: Comment on change in scope for charter
- Re: Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
Thursday, 1 December 2016
- Re: Comment on change in scope for charter
- Comment on change in scope for charter
- Simple changes for Accessibility Guidelines Charter - comments needed
- 75 SCs to vet in 12 weeks.
- 75 new Success Criteria to vet before our FPWD in February
- RE: [Extended] CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
Wednesday, 30 November 2016
- RE: Meta Data
- Re: Meta Data
- Re: Meta Data
- RE: Meta Data
- CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Agenda for Silver TF meeting of 2 December 2016
- RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: [Extended] CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: [Extended] CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
- Re: [Extended] CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Re: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- [Extended] CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Minutes of the Silver Task Force meeting of 29 November 2016
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- Minutes of WCAG WG teleconference of 29 November 2016
- CFC: Issue 72: Proposed change in definition to "set of web pages"
- RE: Meta Data
- Meta Data
- Re: Re[2]: [COGA] Initial feedback requested for SC proposals
- Re[2]: [COGA] Initial feedback requested for SC proposals
- Re: [COGA] Initial feedback requested for SC proposals
- RE: WCAG Agenda November 28, 2016
- [COGA] Initial feedback requested for SC proposals
Monday, 28 November 2016
- Agenda for Silver teleconference of 29 November 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 28, 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 28, 2016
- WCAG Agenda November 28, 2016
Friday, 25 November 2016
Thursday, 24 November 2016
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 23 November 2016
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: Question: placeholder label option
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: Question: placeholder label option
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: Question: placeholder label option
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: Question: placeholder label option
- Re: Question: placeholder label option
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
- List of Silver Stakeholders submitted
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- RE: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: Question: placeholder label option
- Re: DPUB Set of Web Pages
- DPUB Set of Web Pages
- Re: Question: placeholder label option
- Question: placeholder label option
- Re: Agenda November 22, 2016
- Re: Agenda November 22, 2016
- Minutes of the Silver Task Force meeting of 22 November 2016
- Re: Agenda November 22, 2016
Monday, 21 November 2016
- Re: Issue 9: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)
- Re: Issue 9: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)
- RE: Issue 9: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)
- Re: Issue 9: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)
- Re: Agenda November 22, 2016
- Re: Agenda November 22, 2016
- Agenda November 22, 2016
Friday, 18 November 2016
Thursday, 17 November 2016
Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Tuesday, 15 November 2016
- RE: accessibility metadata discussion
- Re: accessibility metadata discussion
- accessibility metadata discussion
- WCAG WG Meeting Notes November 15, 2016
- Minutes of the Silver TF teleconference of 15 November 2016
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 9 November 2016
- RE: WCAG Agenda November 15th , 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 15th , 2016
- Re: WCAG decisions and Working Process
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
Monday, 14 November 2016
- Re: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- WCAG decisions and Working Process
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- Re: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- Re: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- Re: Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- Re: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- Evidence that WCAG 2.0 WG 'promised' to cover Cognitive issues in the next version of WCAG
- RE: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- Re: WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
- WCAG next recommendations we've received over the years commented
Sunday, 13 November 2016
Saturday, 12 November 2016
- WCAG Agenda November 15th , 2016
- Re[2]: Minimum luminosity/contrast requirements for visible focus indicators
Friday, 11 November 2016
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Minimum luminosity/contrast requirements for visible focus indicators
- Re: Minimum luminosity/contrast requirements for visible focus indicators
- Minimum luminosity/contrast requirements for visible focus indicators
Thursday, 10 November 2016
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
Wednesday, 9 November 2016
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
- Silver Task Force set up
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- Re: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- WCAG WG Meeting Minutes November 8, 2016
- WCAG-ACTION-332: Look at meaningful sequence may need an update
- Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Re: UPDATED Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Invitation to submit stakeholder names for Silver
- RE: Agenda November 8, 2016
- RE: UPDATED Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Re: CFC: Issue 245: Add <code> example to H49 technique #245
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- UPDATED Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Re: Agenda November 8, 2016
- RE: Agenda November 8, 2016
- Agenda November 8, 2016
Monday, 7 November 2016
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- Re: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- Re: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- RE: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU
- RE: Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU
- Re: Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Is it 2 or 3 years that WCAG will be updated? - I thought it was approx. 3
- Re: Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU
- RE: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- RE: Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- Charter: Add Digital Publishing Interest Group to section 4.1
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Current gaps in WCAG 2 as reported by Funka to the EU
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
Saturday, 5 November 2016
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
Friday, 4 November 2016
- Minutes of the Silver Subgroup Teleconference of 4 Nov 2016
- RE: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
Thursday, 3 November 2016
- Comments and CFCs
- Re: CFC: Issue 245: Add <code> example to H49 technique #245
- Helping the Silver project
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 2 November 2016
- Re: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[6]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[4]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[3]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- Re: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Re[2]: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- Colour Luminosity/Contrast for form inputs/controls/components
- RE: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- RE: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- CFC this month
- Re: CfC: Silver process - form should be open for two months
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: Issue 245: Add <code> example to H49 technique #245
- RE: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- RE: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- Re: CFC: Issue 245: Add <code> example to H49 technique #245
- Re: CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- CFC: Silver TF Work Statement
- CFC: Issue 245: Add <code> example to H49 technique #245
- Re: CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- CFC: Issue 244: Add H97 to 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks #244
- WCAG Minutes 1 Nov 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 1st , 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 1st , 2016
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: WCAG Agenda November 1st , 2016
Monday, 31 October 2016
Saturday, 29 October 2016
Friday, 28 October 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda October 25, 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda October 25, 2016
- Minutes of the Silver Teleconference of 28 October 2016
- WCAG Agenda October 25, 2016
Thursday, 27 October 2016
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Issue 199
- RE: Silver process
- Re: Scribing
- Daylight Savings Time changes affecting meeting times
- Re: Silver process
- Re: Draft Silver Task Force work statement
- RE: Draft Silver Task Force work statement
- Draft Silver Task Force work statement
- Re: Question F81 note at end of examples will lead to F2 failure
- RE: Silver process
- Re: Silver process
- Re: Silver process
- Re[2]: Silver process
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
Wednesday, 26 October 2016
- RE: Silver process
- Re: Silver process
- RE: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- RE: Icons for the the SCs
- Re: Icons for the the SCs
- Re: Icons for the the SCs
- Icons for the the SCs
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- RE: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 26 October 2016
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 199
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- RE: CfC: Issue 200
- RE: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Silver process
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- RE: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: CfC: Issue 200
- Re: Scribing
Tuesday, 25 October 2016
- CfC: Issue 200
- CfC: Silver process
- CfC: Issue 199
- Re: Scribing
- Re: Scribing
- Scribing
- ISSUE-46: 245
- minutes of Silver subgroup teleconference 25 October 2016
- Re: Agenda October 25, 2016
- Re: Agenda October 25, 2016
Monday, 24 October 2016
- Re: Framework Draft Skeleton - ‘WCAG as JSON’
- RE: Framework Draft Skeleton - ‘WCAG as JSON’ - Data and File Requirements (and Test Procedure) that must meet WCAG 2
Sunday, 23 October 2016
Saturday, 22 October 2016
- RE: Communication and climate reset
- Re: Communication and climate reset
- Re: Communication and climate reset
- Question F81 note at end of examples will lead to F2 failure
- RE: Communication and climate reset
- Re: Communication and climate reset
- Agenda October 25, 2016
- Communication and climate reset
Friday, 21 October 2016
Thursday, 20 October 2016
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review: THREAD CLOSED
- RE: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 19 October 2016
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
Tuesday, 18 October 2016
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- WCAG MInutes Oct 18th 2016
- WCAG-ACTION-331: volunteer to draft a proposal for an entry into the errata document, for review next week
- Assigned Github issue 26
- Re[2]: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Minutes of Silver subgroup teleconference of 18 October 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re[2]: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
Sunday, 16 October 2016
Friday, 14 October 2016
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Charter process moving forward
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- Re[2]: defer work on document about timeline of releases until after FPWD of 2.1 Feb.
- Re: defer work on document about timeline of releases until after FPWD of 2.1 Feb.
- WCAG Agenda Oct 18th 2016
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Understanding & Techniques updated
Thursday, 13 October 2016
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- defer work on document about timeline of releases until after FPWD of 2.1 Feb.
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- FW: WCAG 2.1 under exploration, comments requested by 1 November
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
Wednesday, 12 October 2016
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re[4]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re[2]: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
Tuesday, 11 October 2016
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Agenda October 11, 2016
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- RE: Approve draft charter for AC review
- CfC: Approve draft charter for AC review
- Re: Agenda October 11, 2016
- Options for updating WCAG
- Commentary from Australian Government
- Commentary from Lainey Feingold and Dan Goldstein
- Commentary from Government of Canada
- FW: Question about WCAG more rapid updates
- Silver Process and draft Work Statement
- Re: Agenda October 11, 2016
- Re: Agenda October 11, 2016
Monday, 10 October 2016
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: Canceled: meeting
- Re: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: Agenda October 11, 2016
- RE: Agenda October 11, 2016
- Errant Meeting WCAG Invite from mhakkinen
- Canceled: meeting
- meeting
- Agenda October 11, 2016
- RE: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re[5]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re[3]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re[2]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
Sunday, 9 October 2016
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
Saturday, 8 October 2016
Friday, 7 October 2016
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: Re[2]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re[2]: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Fwd: CGB Releases White Paper on Access Issues to Information and Communication Technologies for People with Cognitive Disabilities; Announces Disability Advisory Committee Recommendations for Best Practices.
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
Thursday, 6 October 2016
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 5 October 2016
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
- Re: charter update with two year cycle
Wednesday, 5 October 2016
- charter update with two year cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- Re: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- Re: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- RE: should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
- should we have a 2 year refresh cycle or a 4-5 year refresh cycle
Tuesday, 4 October 2016
- Re: WCAG WG minutes
- WCAG WG minutes
- Re: Combining SCs
- Re: Combining SCs
- RE: Combining SCs
- Re: Combining SCs
- RE: Combining SCs
- Re[2]: Combining SCs
- Re: Combining SCs
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: WCAG Agenda Oct 1st 2016
- Re: Combining SCs
Monday, 3 October 2016
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Combining SCs
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- Re: Combining SCs
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Question: testing for non-unique id values SC 4.1.1
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: WCAG Agenda Oct 1st 2016
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs
- RE: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs
- Re: Combining the sizing SCs