I also agree that this is what 4.1.1 SHOULD require. But I think the language of the SC currently requires all id's in the DOM to be unique. I think we could justify a clarification (change) in the Understanding given that all the rational provided is about accessibility of components. Perhaps add the sentence. What should the clarifying language be? Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29 September 2016 at 15:01, Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> So id values repeated in hidden content that are not referenced by any >> ARIA attribute do not need to be fixed strictly from an accessibility >> standpoint. Is this view accurate? > > > I agree with this. > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> >
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2016 14:49:29 UTC