Missing scribing notes

We lost connectivity in the meeting room, these are the scribe notes from the end of the first session today:

 Judy: As a midpoint reflection, this is an impressive amount of work. If we're looking for a decision today, worried that we might loose time by trying to move fast. There are also a lot of people not here. 
Shawn: We looking for a non-binding decision here, we'll send it out to the working group with the reasoning for the chosen option. Not looking to make the decision until end of Oct. 
  Disconnected 
Shawn: Most flexible option. Overall goal is to have a focus on what will have the most flexibility long term, so as technology changes we can iterate the guidelines and have something more flexible as a result. 
Shawn: Emphasis will be on outreach to the most diverse people & groups. Stakeholder interviews are more similar to the design approach, with a wide net. Self reporting is not as comprehensive, similar to faster-progress option. Focus in scope & sizing will be on organisations which have a track record of having flexibility in their approaches. 
Shawn: In analysis, will be a little more comprehensive. Communication will be as-per the other options. Analysis: Would be a meeting of the sub-group... (networking issues impacting IRC) 
Shawn: Experimentation - we'd also focus on prototypes which include the mechanics of updating. We'd probably do some A/B testing, but definitely need to valid the prototypes. No focus groups in this one. 
Shawn: Desirability testing would be a part of this one.  
Shawn: In the production and evolution phase, the flexible option is a bit different as there are more unknowns that wouldn't be established until the earlier phases. 
Shawn: Milestones wouldn't just be until we get to silver (launch), then what are the milestones afterwards. 
Shawn: Also unique to this option is some crowd sourcing. Ultimately, we want people to be able to come in and identify gaps, an agile iteration cycle.  
Q:  has this been done before in other standards processes?  
Shawn: We'll find out in the research phase. 
Jeanne: The low-cost is our least attractive option, more volunteers, fewer surveys, no contextual interviews, informal research into other areas. Much of the discussion would be on the WCAG email lists. Unlikely to do the literature review.  
Jeanne: Minimal personas, but would do the user-stories. Multiple 1/2 day teleconferences to discuss findings and doing reports. 
Jeanne: In production phase, it will be typical ways we do things today. 
Jeanne: We'll ID the editors, follow the general process we do things today. This is basically the backup. 
Jeanne: Take the break-time to discuss and refine your thought, everyone should have a chance to speak and we'll collate thoughts and use the flip charts etc.

Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 09:42:45 UTC