- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:19:00 -0700
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SAL4hh-GueK+rzuvmbVtE4i0k3CZyN=V3XhDob=gvrzog@mail.gmail.com>
To All, This really reminds me of the arguments people had about wheel chair ramps. Architects thought they were ugly. Now we just design beautiful buildings with ramps. An icon might be nice, but a professional page architect should be able to make the word transcript fit into the scheme in an attractive way. Wayne On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:52 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > I find a lot of designers of commercial sites don't like to have their > interface littered with links that say "transcript". > > I notice a few icons online. > http://tinyurl.com/z6br724 > > Should we mention this in 2.1, that icons are ok, or should we try to push > some momentum behind the icon idea... Perhaps that will result in an > emerging definitive and recognizable icon (or letter combination). Like the > CC for closed captions. > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 22:20:12 UTC