RE: Re[2]: Checklist for Proposals

Sorry for top post but yes,  thanks Jason. 

Sent from TypeApp



On 15 Aug 2016, 16:23, at 16:23, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
>
>From: josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
>Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:35 AM
>
>
>A substantive suggestion: in item 4, where a new Guideline is needed,
>perhaps it should be proposed separately and then referred to by each
>Success Criterion proposal that is related to it.
>Sorry Jason, I don't understand how this idea is different from the
>current process? I feel like I'm missing something here! It maybe
>obvious, but please clarify your reasoning for me.
>[Jason] The suggestion was that, instead of proposing a new guideline
>as part of the proposal for each success criterion that requires it,
>there should be one proposal for the new Guideline that is then
>referred to in each success criterion proposal that would fall under
>it. That is, Guideline proposals would be separate and distinct from
>Success Criteria proposals.
>Does this help to clarify the issue?
>
>
>________________________________
>
>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
>confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for
>whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received
>this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy,
>distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this
>information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this
>e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>Thank you for your compliance.
>
>________________________________