- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:23:20 +0000
- To: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- CC: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@raisingthefloor.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sailesh, This is in a CfC now, so the key question is whether your concern is about something that you can live with or if it is not. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk On 8/9/16, 21:23, "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com> wrote: >With reference to: "2. Use glossary definitions to simplify and > shorten all Success Criteria for shared or ambiguous terms": > Comment: is the word "shared" needed? > A term may appear in multiple places but if its meaning is not > ambiguous then it does not need a definition. > A term even if used only once may need a definition if: > - it is used in a manner that is not in line with what is generally > understood to mean or convey. > - or to limit its meaning to a specific interpretation among > multiple possible interpretations > >This is what "ambiguous" generally conveys but it might be helpful to >clarify along the lines suggested. >Thanks, >Sailesh Panchang
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 03:23:53 UTC