RE: Acceptance Criteria for proposals for new Success Criteria

I agree with Jason's comments on this

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:34:23 +0300  White<jjwhite@ets.org> wrote ---- 

     
  
   From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 1:41 PM
 
 
    
 
 
       2.Be testable through automated or manual processes.
  [Jason] They should be as reliably testable as possible, while achieving their intended purpose and benefit.
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
  Why is this significant?  If a criterion doesn’t achieve the intended purpose then it won’t be accepted.
 [Jason] It’s significant in that it explicitly states the trade-off that success criterion writers need to consider. Making a requirement more reliably testable can easily occur at the expense of achieving its goals, and thus I am proposing to acknowledge the balancing which needs to be done.
 
   
 
      6.Apply to all content, unless specific exceptions are included in the success criteria (e.g. "except interruptions involving an emergency").
  [Jason] Where a success criterion applies to only some types of content or only under specific conditions, such conditions should be stated explicitly (e.g., “If non-text content is time-based media”).
 
 
 
 
   
 
  I think that your change says the same thing, but doesn’t work with the structure of the prompt, so leaving as is.
 [Jason] Exceptions and explicitly stated conditions aren’t the same thing, in my view, hence I do not think it should be left as is.
  
 
 
 
 
  This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
 
 Thank you for your compliance.