- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:53:48 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 22/07/2016 09:43, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > I could, in principle, see an argument for authors being required to > provide alternatives. But this does feel like it could be a good example > of a broader thought I have for an SC to cover "advanced sensors" in the > mobile TF work, which (once I've drafted it) will say something along > the lines of "as you can't rely on the presence of these sorts of > advanced sensors (tilt sensor, light sensor, [and here we could add > fingerprint sensor used for biometric authentication]), ensure that > alternative accessible mechanisms are available for users to trigger > functionality/control the web page" Oh, forgot the other part of that thought...not just that sensors may not be available, but that even when sensor IS available, a user may not be able to / have difficulty using it. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 08:54:10 UTC