- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 20:53:11 -0400
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- CC: Patrick Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP1017CEE6C41AB77F8DB2EE6FE0A0@phx.gbl>
2.1.1 says all functionality of the page has to be achievable with keyboard. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com > wrote: > Thanks David, > > > > Well, also allowing for an alternate biometric as well as via text > input….. > > > > Can you point me to the Biometric that you are talking about? > > > > > > > > > > > > ** katie ** > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea* > *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* > <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 > <703-371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> > > > > *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 21, 2016 7:21 PM > *To:* Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>; Patrick Lauke < > redux@splintered.co.uk> > *Cc:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? > > > > yup... we currently require any input including Bio-metric,to be keyboard > accessible, but perhaps there is room for more. > > > > It might fit into Patrick's wider "input" conversation, categorizing input > devices (camera, shaking manipulating, etc.) into three broad categories, > with perhaps a special category. It's a conversation in the mobile task > force that has just begun but I guess will spill out because of it's > general nature. > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL < > ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Along the same lines as the ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC, do we want > discuss including a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > ** katie ** > > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section > 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com > <ryladog@gmail.com> **|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> | Office: 703-371-5545 > <703-371-5545> | @ryladog <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>* > > > > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 00:53:49 UTC