Re: Do we want a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?

yup... we currently require any input including Bio-metric,to be keyboard
accessible, but perhaps there is room for more.

It might fit into Patrick's wider "input" conversation, categorizing input
devices (camera, shaking manipulating, etc.) into three broad categories,
with perhaps a special category. It's a conversation in the mobile task
force that has just begun but I guess will spill out because of it's
general nature.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Folks,
>
>
>
> Along the same lines as the ‘Functional Performance-like’ SC, do we want
> discuss including a Biometric Alternative SC in WCAG 2.1?
>
>
>
> ​​​​​Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ** katie **
>
>
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
>
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <703-371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com
> <ryladog@gmail.com> **|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>* *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <703-371-5545> **|** @ryladog <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>*
>
>
>