- From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:53:31 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- CC: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BY2PR0701MB19903D03AF23E7691EE5BAEDAB080@BY2PR0701MB1990.namprd07.prod.outlook.>
From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:22 PM I teach blind users how to use screen readers about 20% of my time, so I'm exposed to a fair number of screen reader users at all levels. Beginner and intermediate screen reader users depend heavily on lists of links. Advanced users such as those who we associate with do not tend to depend on links lists as much. [Jason] I belong to the latter category: I almost never use lists of links, regardless of which screen reader/operating system is in question. Aside from your reason above, the expanded definition addresses what appears to be a genuine ambiguity in the application of WCAG 2.0, SC 2.4.4. I think a real ambiguity that can be resolved without creating further difficulties (as may well be the case here) is reason enough to accept a proposal. (Everything that satisfies the old definition will satisfy the new one.) On the other hand, I think it’s a small issue in the larger context of WCAG 2.1. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 20:54:06 UTC