Re: (WCAG 2.1) Do we want to replace ​"programmatically determined link context" in 2.4.4 with "Accessible Name"?

I hope you don't mean the accessible name as in the accessible name
computation in ARIA 1.0 and 1.1.  That is out of the frying pan into the
fire.

Wayne

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:13 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> ***This is proposed for version 2.1. NOT for 2.0 ***
>
> Do we want to consider replacing
> ​"
> programmatically determined link context" with "Accessible name" in 2.4.4.
>
> This will simplify the requirement, eliminate that awkward definition that
> few developers understood, and ensure that when screen reader users pull up
> a list of links on on conforming page, they will not get "learn more"
> etc... because screen readers provide the accessible name in the links
> list, not just the link text. So an aria-label or aria-labelledby will
> render a meaningful text in the list. AccessibleName wasn't well understood
> or supported back in 2006-2008.
>
> ===Current===
>
> 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context): The purpose of each link can be
> determined from the link text alone or from the link text together with its
> ​​
> programmatically determined link context, except where the purpose of the
> link would be ambiguous to users in general. (Level A)
>
> ​=== Proposal change===
>
> 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context): The purpose of each link can be
> determined from the link text alone or Accessible Name, except where the
> purpose of the link would be ambiguous to users in general. (Level A)
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 16:08:18 UTC