- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:33:34 -0700
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SD6zfXvw=6sbv073MOwYEEDepRq9hFzByh=J2KM9KokmA@mail.gmail.com>
There are two problems with this. 1) It doesn't really match the commitment we made to only replace SCs with stronger requirements... very inexact wording 2) Dropping content requirements based on UA behavior seems a little hasty. I think changes that dropping SCs is for the big overhaul, when we can address UAs as well. Wayne On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: > Ø I think this question has merit, and is related to the question of > what SCs are showing their age, and/or are things that are just not > substantial fails (or may not represent significant a11y issues any more). > > > > I don’t think we should/can remove or deprioritize anything for SC 2.1. > IMO all SC still have some relevance. > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > *From:* josh@interaccess.ie [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie] > *Sent:* Friday, July 15, 2016 12:56 AM > *To:* David MacDonald; WCAG; Jeanne Spellman > *Subject:* Re: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "David MacDonald" <david100@sympatico.ca> > > [...] > > > > Are there any SCs that have been overcome sufficiently by the environment, > OS, User Agents etc. that we can remove them without breaking the > acceptance requirement of WCAG 2.1 that meeting it also meets 2.0? > > I think this question has merit, and is related to the question of what > SCs are showing their age, and/or are things that are just not substantial > fails (or may not represent significant a11y issues any more). > > > > Thanks > > > > Josh > > > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > http://www.can-adapt.com/ > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > >
Received on Monday, 18 July 2016 20:34:43 UTC