RE: New SC: Meaningful element name

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 3:19 PM
To: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>

It might fit in with the proposed failure of 1.3.1.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/173


[Jason] Yes, definitely. 1.3.1 covers a wide variety of situations, as does 4.1.2. I suppose a case could be made for extending 4.1.2 beyond “user interface components”, but the counter-argument would be that 1.3.1 addresses the need sufficiently already.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________