- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:13:18 +0100
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 15/07/2016 15:10, White, Jason J wrote: > */[Jason] This is a fundamentally important observation. The type of > assistive technology under consideration could be regarded as satisfying > the following requirements./* > > */1. /*It is available to the public (whether for free or on a > commercial basis). > > */2. /*It supports relevant standards so that the content author > need not specifically support it with measures not required by other > standards-conformant AT. > > Such definitions are much more valuable and specific than words such as > “mainstream”. Agree, was probably trying to get away with proposing a minimally invasive, but too wooly, tweak to the definition. I'm all for more clarity! P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 14:13:39 UTC