- From: <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:23:32 +0000
- To: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <em33a77bd6-7a8c-49f9-b6a9-53d2f0e1f2fd@josh_machine>
------ Original Message ------ From: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com> To: "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>; "WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: 15/07/2016 11:13:32 Subject: Re: Re[2]: Should we drop any WCAG 2 SCs in 2.1? >Josh wrote: > > > Parsing, could also be a candidate? > > > >Possibly, we do occasionally bring things up from there but it is a >pain wading through the results. > Ditto. > > To be a playful devil here, does it really? For most organisations, >if they get to AA - that's just it. > > > They happily leave it there and sail off into the sunset. > > > >Yes, but my point was that without AAA, they might consider A enough. > > > >There was an experiment (from behavioral economics I think) where they >had two breadmakers for sale at $50 and $100. Everyone bought the >cheapest one. > > > >However, when they added a $250 breadmaker, it made the $100 one look >much more reasonable and most people bought that… that’s what I meant >by framing. Anyhow, that was a side point, I wasn’t suggesting it! > Thanks for the explanation, I did need it as I didn't catch the subtleties of your point, appreciated. Josh > > > >-Alastair > > >
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 11:21:22 UTC