- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:36:11 -0400
- To: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
- CC: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, "jimallan@tsbvi.edu" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP262EB61AD4078B3358708CFE380@phx.gbl>
I've amended the proposal with two versions with the exception... the language from 1.4.5 and Jason's perhaps more appropriate "spacial" exception... https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Possible_wording_from_Jason/David_for_LVTF_re:_zoom_without_horizontal_scroll Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:05 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Maybe we can borrow language from SC 2.4.5 the essential exception: > > * > SC X.X.X If text is resized up to 200% (or 300, 400, 800%?) without > assistive technology, the layout of the Web page ensures that it can be > viewed in its entirety without requiring the user to scroll the viewport > horizontally, and without loss of content or functionality, unless a > particular presentation of text is essential to the information being > conveyed. > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:22 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > >> I think it's on the right track ... although we may want to bump up the >> minimum in 2.1 from 200% to 300% or 400%, (or 800%?) that should be the >> LVTF's call. >> >> And will have to consider Gregg's exceptions, and how to address them.... >> perhaps by using. Maybe limiting the requirement to blocks of text (not in >> a data table) or something. >> >> This would be a new requirement in 2.1 given that WCAG does not forbid >> the horizontal scroll at Level A. I think we're drifting into LVTF >> territory, so perhaps we should punt this proposal to them. I've captured >> the conversation here for them to consider: >> >> >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Possible_wording_from_Jason/David_for_LVTF_re:_zoom_without_horizontal_scroll >> >> >> Cheers, >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* >> Tel: 613.235.4902 >> >> LinkedIn >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> >> >> twitter.com/davidmacd >> >> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> >> >> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> >> >> >> >> * Adapting the web to all users* >> * Including those with disabilities* >> >> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy >> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] >>> *Sent:* Monday, July 4, 2016 12:28 PM >>> >>> >>> >>> - We want you to make a responsive design that shifts to single column >>> when zoomed. >>> >>> - If a user *does* zoom on their "desktop", we don't want them to loose >>> information from the "desktop" view/site. So don't drop content, and if you >>> do, make sure the user can get it back while staying in one column. >>> >>> *[Jason] Leaving out the “desktop” and “mobile” aspect, which may not be >>> needed here, you appear to be saying that there should be a requirement >>> such as the following.* >>> >>> *If text is resized up to 200% without assistive technology, the layout >>> of the Web page ensures that it can be viewed in its entirety without >>> requiring the user to scroll the viewport horizontally, and without loss of >>> content or functionality.* >>> >>> *Note: content or functionality may be shifted to a diferent Web page >>> upon resizing of text, provided that it remains within a conforming set of >>> Web pages, and that the user can reach it from the page on which text has >>> been resized.* >>> >>> How close is this to your proposal? >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or >>> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom >>> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail >>> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or >>> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete >>> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. >>> >>> Thank you for your compliance. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 19:36:45 UTC