From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 2:23 PM I think it's on the right track ... although we may want to bump up the minimum in 2.1 from 200% to 300% or 400%, (or 800%?) that should be the LVTF's call. And will have to consider Gregg's exceptions, and how to address them.... perhaps by using. Maybe limiting the requirement to blocks of text (not in a data table) or something. [Jason] You could limit it to blocks of text outside data tables and user interface controls. However, an interactive map of Antarctica, for example, where selecting a point displays further information, is arguably one large UI control – so that proposal probably doesn’t work unless we’re more specific about what kinds of control we mean to allow. Something along the lines of “where the spatial layout of the content is not essential to its use for the purposes for which users are intended to read or interact with it” might work. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 18:59:39 UTC