- From: Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:47:23 +0300
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Patrick Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 13:52:39 UTC
it doesn't matter limited functionality in different environments does not fall under the scope of wcag 2 because all users are subject to the same "disadvantage". (actually there is no disadvantage, rather an advantage to not cluttering up the screen, and leaving design patterns to designers). On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 July 2016 at 14:30, Adam Solomon <adam.solomon2@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It is common in responsive design to provide different even limited >> functionality for mobile users as David described. > > > how common? > can we have some data on this, is it 10%, 50%? > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> >
Received on Monday, 4 July 2016 13:52:39 UTC