Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop

WOHOO!

I've filed an issue to get it on a call for consensus, and add the
paragraph to the Understanding Conformance Requirement Section...
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/197


Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 30/06/2016 22:21, David MacDonald wrote:
>
> Perhaps we can manage it like this.
>>
>> "The full page includes each view of the page that is customized for
>> various devices, browsers, or screen sizes. Each of these views (or
>> their respective conforming alternate versions) would need to conform in
>> order for the entire page to conform. On the other hand, if a user
>> voluntarily chooses a setting on the page that optimizes or personalizes
>> the state of the page for accessibility reasons, this new state does not
>> necessarily need to pass every Success Criteria in order to personalize
>> the page, because the conforming version can be reached by undoing the
>> setting."
>>
>
> Much to the relief of everybody on the mailing lists, I'll cautiously say
> that I could live with that ;)
>
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>