- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:19:51 +0100
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
At a stretch, if there really is such a concern that developers will use "alternate accessible version" as an excuse to server sub-par experiences instead of making any effort to make their "mobile" version work (though as I mentioned repeatedly, I think the danger of the "desktop" version being sub-par would be highly mitigated by making sure WCAG 2.1 has appropriate SCs to fight any "sub-par-ishness", here's a thought (since 508 was mentioned at one point in this discussion): how about adding a non-normative Note 9 to "conforming alternate version" which borrows some of the wording from 1194.22 (k) and says Note 9: authors SHOULD [ed: in the actual RFC 2119 sense] only rely on having a "conforming alternate version" when compliance cannot be accomplished in any other way P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2016 19:20:17 UTC