Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop

On 28/06/2016 18:44, ALAN SMITH wrote:

> you state “instead qualify it more specifically as being "touchscreen
> accessibility", "small-screen
>
> accessibility", we find the same issues. These smaller screens often
> have totally different user interface and content design with a lot less
> clutter.

And I'm not saying that there aren't differences between 
mouse/touchscreen, large screen/small screen, etc. I'm saying let's 
actually be precise about terminology used, or risk having language that 
is immediately obsolete.

If the worry is that small-screen versions may think they're exempt from 
being accessible if they provide a link to a large-screen version, then 
let's be specific about what we're actually trying to say without 
falling back to "mobile vs desktop". See for instance 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2016AprJun/0910.html

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 17:55:01 UTC