- From: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 08:31:33 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:32:10 UTC
We currently have a bit of a hole in WCAG 2 that I think we should plug in 2.1. If a web page has a conforming alternative, then it doesn't need to conform itself. However, in the world of responsible design, it means if the desktop version conforms, the mobile version does not need to. I think we should plug this in WCAG 2.1. It might be as simple as adding a sentence to the definition of conforming alternative that large screen views of web pages do not qualify as a conforming alternative to small screen views. It will take some thought as to the exact wording and approach but it needs to be addressed I woulds say, otherwise organizations may just say they don't meed to make the mobile view accessible. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conforming-alternate-versiondef Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:32:10 UTC